Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-221348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in medical sciences and increased awareness of measures for safe child birth, unacceptably high maternal morbidity and mortality continues in developing countries like India. Ours being a tertiary care centre, draws a lot number of high risk pregnancies and referrals. By auditing the near miss cases2 i.e., a critically ill pregnant or recently delivered woman who was on the verge of death but survived a problem during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days of the pregnancy's termination, we aim to identify the causes, factors leading to near miss2 and the management given to near miss2 and maternal deaths. The AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: present study aims to determine the magnitude, as well as to identify the pattern of Maternal Near Miss2 (MNM), at Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, during the study period of two years. To anal OBJECTIVES: yse 1)Adverse events leading to a maternal near-miss2, 2) Disorders underlying these cases, 3)Sociodemographic factors and 4)Contributing factors A hospital based retros METHODOLOGY: pective observational study to assess the frequency and nature of maternal near miss2 events among the obstetric cases managed at Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada over a period of two years. The followi RESULTS: ng are the major causes identified leading to maternal near miss2 during our study Severe Eclampsia 17%, Post-partum Haemorrhage 17%, Pulmonary Edema due to severe pre eclampsia3 9%, Antepartum Eclampsia 9%, HELLP 9%, Ruptured ectopic pregnancy 7%, Cardiac failure 7%, Postpartum Eclampsia 7%, Imminent Eclampsia 4%, Abruption 4%, Rupture uterus 2%. In our study Maternal near miss2 ratio incidence: 0.0254, Severe maternal outcomes ratio : 3, Maternal near miss2 to mortality ratio: 0.433 CONCLUSION: We observed in majority of the cases level 1 and level 2 delays in reporting to our institution

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-219870

ABSTRACT

Background:A maternal near miss case is defined as a “a woman who nearly died but survived a complication that occurred during pregnancy,child birth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy”1.MMR is defined as ratio of number of maternal deaths per 1000 live births. All pregnant women deserve a good quality of care especially Emergency Obstetric Care including proper infrastructure, human resources that can detect and manage such complications earliest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the causes of maternal near miss cases, various management modalities performed and maternal and fetal outcome in near miss cases. Material And Methods:A retrospective study was carried out in obstetrics and gynaecology department of SCL municipal general hospital, Ahmedabad for identification of MNM as per MNM-R operational guidelines (2014) in a tertiary care hospital from August 2020 to March 2022. Result:Total deliveries during our study period were 9266 out of which 535 number of patients developed complications, 75 patients ended up becoming near miss cases and 30 maternal mortalities were observed.Hypertensive disorders (38.6%) followed by severe anemia (18.6%) and haemorrhage (13.3%) were the commonest underlying causes leading to MNM. More than one management modality was followed in one case. 25% of patients required blood transfusion. Out of which 11 patients required massive blood transfusion (>5 units of blood) and 16% of patients required blood products along with blood resulting from either severe anemia or altered coagulopathy (DIC). 69.3% of patients required ICU stay of <5 days and majority of patients required hospital stay of 9-14 days.63.6% of patients required ICU stay of 1-4 days.Live birth rate was 82.6%.Conclusion:Maternal health is the direct indicator of prevailing health status in a country. Reduction in maternal mortality is one of the targets of MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS13for 2015 but in spite of full efforts by all the health care professionals, it still remains a challenge in developing countries.There should be prompt and proper management of high-risk groups by frequent antenatal visits. Aggressive management of each complication and close monitoring of women in labour, decision making in mode and time of termination of pregnancy are important to prevent further complications.

3.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-219863

ABSTRACT

Background:Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality continue to have a huge impact on the lives of Indian women and their newborns. Any pregnant woman can develop life-threatening complications with little or no advance warning. All women need access to quality maternal health services that can detect and manage such complications1. Complications during pregnancy and childbirth remain a leading cause of death among women of reproductive age in India2. Each year in India, roughly 28 million women experience pregnancy and 26 million have a live birth. Of these estimated 67000 maternal and 10,00000 newborn deaths occur every year3. The maternal near-miss event was defined as “any acute obstetric complication that immediately threatens a woman’s survival but does not result in her death either by chance or because of hospital care she receives during pregnancy, labor or within 6 weeks of termination of pregnancy4.Maternal mortality data in practical terms is the tip of an iceberg while the maternal near-miss data is invisible and whic h is a very important tool to reduce maternal mortality.Material And Methods:This is a retrospective observational study carried out among 80 maternal near-miss cases who were admitted in obstetric ICU fulfilling criteria for identification for maternal near-miss cases as per Maternal Near Miss Review Operational Guideline (December 2014)in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, in our tertiary care teaching hospital, between October 1, 2018, to October 31,2020.Patient fulfilling criteria for identification of near-miss cases as per Maternal Near miss Review Operational Guideline (December, 2014)Minimum 3 criteria were included in the study.Result:During the study period total of 18360 obstetric patients were admitted, out of which 80 patients ended up becoming maternal near-miss cases. Among them majority of patients were in age group of 18-25 years and occurrence was high in multipara women. In many patients more than one underlying disorder was present. Hemorrhage (67.5%) followed by a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (30.0%) was the commonest presenting disorder in near-miss cases. In spite of being highly preventable, maternal sepsis (6.2%) also contributes to being a major cause of morbidity.In our study, 15% of near-miss cases had associated medical conditions. 5 % of cases (n=4) in the present study faced acute severe respiratory depression (ARDS) after getting infected with covid-19 infection. There was need for massive blood transfusions in 63.75 %, magnesium sulfate therapy in 17.25%, use of cardiotonic /vasopressor drugs in 10.0%, obstetric hysterectomy in 23.75 % of cases. More than one management modality was followed in many patients. All the near-miss cases were covered with broad spectrum antibiotic therapy. Total 21 near-miss cases (26.25%) were identified to have delays. Delay in the decision to seek care (Delay 1) occurred in 2.5% of women. Educational backwardness, ignorance of pregnancy itself, lack of regular antenatal care, and failure to give importance to warning signals may be the contributing factors. Delay in accessing adequate care (Delay 2) was identified in 7.5% of women. Conclusion: Hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, abnormalities of labor, anemia, and sepsis are still major contributing factors for maternal near-miss cases. Anticipation, early diagnosis, and prompt treatment of maternal complications can reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Sensitization of the population for proper utilization of available maternal health care facilities is very vital for reducing maternal near-miss cases.All the maternal near-miss cases are living le ssons, who de spite their misery show us our deficiencies.

4.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-207987

ABSTRACT

Background: Obstetrics near miss is an important indicator that reflects the quality of obstetrics care in a health facility. It assesses and monitors the activities aimed for prevention of maternal mortality. The aim and objective of this study was to find out the incidence, the prevalence and the causes of maternal near miss cases due to severe obstetrics complications.Methods: This is a retrospective study done in department of obstetrics and gynecology in GMC Chandrapur. The study was done during a period from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019.Results: In this study the hospital maternal near miss incidence ratio was 13.11%. In this study authors found the most common morbidity was (36.06%) hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, (28.68%) cases of major obstetric haemorrhage, (7.37%) severe systemic infection or sepsis, (2.45%) labour related disorders. In medical disorders very severe anaemia, (13.11%) was most common cause of near miss. The most common cause of death was post-partum haemorrhage (41.66%) and most of the patients referred from periphery in very critical condition.Conclusions: Haemorrhage and hypertension disorders are the leading causes of MNM. Prompt diagnosis and adequate management of near miss cases can reduce mortality rates.

5.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-206911

ABSTRACT

Background: Obstetrics near miss is an important indicator that reflects the quality of obstetrics care in a health facility. It assesses and monitors the activities aimed for prevention of maternal mortality. The aim and objective of this study was to find out the incidence, the prevalence and causes of maternal near miss due to severe obstetric complications and to identify the gapes and contextualize corrective measures to be taken in our facility.Methods: This is a retrospective study done in department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in GMC associated with DHS Shivpuri MP. The study was done during a period from 1st January 2018 to 30 April 2019.Results: In this study the hospital maternal near miss incidence ratio was 14.34%. In our study we found the most common morbidity was (30.18%) hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. These 159 near miss diagnoses were comprised of (30.18 %) cases of Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, (27.67%) cases of major obstetric hemorrhage, (6.91) Severe systemic infection or sepsis, (4.40%) Labour related disorders. In Medical disorders very Severe Anemia, (1.88%) was most common cause of near miss. The most common cause of death was post-partum hemorrhage 37.5% and most of the patients referred from periphery in very critical condition.  The median time taken to get clinical intervention among cases was 20-40 minutes after admission.Conclusions: Hemorrhage and hypertension disorders are the leading causes of MNM. Prompt diagnosis and adequate management of near miss cases can reduce mortality rates.

6.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-206691

ABSTRACT

Background: In practical terms, women are considered near-miss cases when they survive conditions which threaten their life i.e. organ dysfunction. Despite advances in medical science and increased awareness of measures for safe childbirth, unacceptably high maternal morbidity and mortality continues to plague developing countries like India. Our’s being a tertiary care centre, draws a lot number of high-risk patients and referrals. By auditing these near miss cases, we aim to identify the causes, factors leading to near miss, to identify management gaps to prevent near misses and maternal death.Methods: Retro-prospective cross-sectional study done over one and a half year. Patients were included based on the inclusion criteria. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the prospective cases and the indoor case sheets were used for retrospective cases. After data entry in excel sheet, data analysis was done using SPSS 21. Results were tabulated.Results: High number of Near Miss cases with preeclampsia being the commonest. Lack of proper facilities at the periphery health centers was the most common cause for referrals. Level 1 and level 2 delays were found in most cases.Conclusions: Timely referral, with adequate treatment at the peripheral hospitals will majorly reduce Near miss. Hence, proper development and functioning of peripheral hospitals are needed.

7.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-206672

ABSTRACT

Background: A maternal near-miss case is defined by World Health Organization (WHO) as “a woman who nearly died but survived a complication that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy.” Severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) is the acronym for the more popular term of ‘near-miss’ cases. There are approximately 118 life threatening events of “near miss mortality” or SAMM for each maternal death. Analysing near miss cases can prevent maternal death.Methods: It is a retrospective study based on medical records. Sample size is all the pregnant cases admitted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in AIMSR, Hyderabad, Telangana, India over the period of January 2015- June 2017 (two and half years) i.e. 2276. All records were gathered and each record that satisfy near miss criteria/maternal mortality were segregated, data has been collected on the occurrence of severe pregnancy-related complications or those who require critical interventions and admission to intensive care unit as per the proforma (according to WHO near miss questionnaire). Data entry done in MS Excel and analyzed using Epi Info.Results: Total MNM/SAMM patients were 85 out of 2276 pregnant women (3.7%). The duration of the stay, potential life-threatening conditions (PTLC), critical interventions, organ dysfunctions, mode of delivery, treatment for PPH, hypertensive disorders and associated conditions among SAMM patients were calculated. SAMM patients who has severe post-partum hemorrhage PPH were 24.7%, severe pre-eclampsia was 31.7%, eclampsia was 2.4%, patients with both severe PPH and eclampsia were 2.4%.Conclusions: Near misses can be prevented to some extent by spreading awareness about possible obstetric complications and risk stratification. The WHO tool for analysis of maternal near miss or SAMM can identify more preventable causes of maternal death. Prospective monitoring of maternal morbidity may be useful in identifying determinants of severe maternal mortality.

8.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-206426

ABSTRACT

Background: Hepatitis E is usually a self-limited viral infection in men and non-pregnant women, but during pregnancy it is associated with high maternal and perinatal mortality. This needs to be studied for early diagnosis and better management.Methods: The study commenced after the approval of Institutional Ethics Committee. This was a retrospective cum prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit in present tertiary care hospital between February 2012 and July 2017. An analysis of 120 cases was made over a period of five years.Results: In this study the incidence of pregnant patients with hepatitis E was 3.09 per 1000 deliveries. It was found that majority of the patients which were diagnosed with hepatitis E were young and belonged to the age group of 21-25 years. Most of the affected patients were primigravida with increasing severity of the disease in their third trimester. The maternal morbidity was 51% with a mortality rate of 20%. The percentage of still birth was 25.64% with increased incidence of preterm deliveries and poor perinatal outcome.Conclusions: Early diagnosis and rapid management of the complications such as correction of abnormal coagulation and supportive management is the best treatment available at present. ICU admission and with strict maternal and foetal monitoring can help improve the outcome and thereby reducing the maternal and perinatal mortality.

9.
Rev. bras. crescimento desenvolv. hum ; 28(2): 165-174, Jan.-Mar. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-958521

ABSTRACT

This article investigates the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) during a current pregnancy and severe maternal morbidity severe maternal morbidity among pregnant and postpartum women cared for in public maternity centers located in São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 109 women who developed Severe maternal morbidity were selected according to criteria adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO). Another 337 women who did not experience any clinical, laboratory or management intercurrences during a current pregnancy and postpartum were selected for the control group. The participants were submitted to a retrospective investigation of IPV using an instrument adapted from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women, applied between November 2010 and June 2011. The relationship between the response variable severe maternal morbidity and the exposure variable (IPV) adjusted for the remaining independent variables was assessed through proportions, a chi-square test, a Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression. A prevalence of 12.6% (CI:9.5-15.7) for psychological violence, 7.6% (CI:5.1-10.1) for physical violence and 1.6% (CI:0.4-2.8) for sexual violence were observed during a current pregnancy in both the case and control groups. Although no statistical significance was found between IPV exposure during a current pregnancy and the occurrence of Severe maternal morbidity (p>0.264), we identified factors associated with unfavorable socio-demographic and reproductive conditions in both the women exposed to IPV and those who developed Severe maternal morbidity. Systematic monitoring of Severe maternal morbidity and routine screening of IPV among pregnant women are important measures to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality and to qualify reproductive health care.


Este artigo investigou a associação entre violência por parceiro íntimo (IPV) durante a gravidez atual e morbidade materna grave entre gestantes e puérperas atendidas em maternidades públicas na Grande São Paulo, Brasil. Um total de 109 mulheres que desenvolveram Morbidade materna grave foi selecionado de acordo com os critérios adotados pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Outras 337 mulheres que não apresentaram nenhuma intercorrência clínica, laboratorial ou de manejo durante a gestação atual e puerpério, foram selecionadas para o grupo controle. As participantes foram submetidas à investigação retrospectiva de IPV utilizando-se um instrumento adaptado do WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women, aplicado entre Novembro 2010 e Junho 2011. A relação entre a variável resposta (Morbidade materna grave) e a variável exposição (IPV) ajustadas para as demais variáveis independentes, foram avaliadas através de proporções, teste chi-quadrado, teste exato de Fischer e regressão logística múltipla. A prevalência de 12.6% (IC:9,5-15,7) para violência psicológica, 7.6% (IC:5,1-10,1) para violência física e 1.6% (IC:0,4-2,8) para violência sexual foi observada durante a gravidez atual em ambos os grupos de casos e controles. Embora não tenha sido identificada significância estatística entre exposição a IPV durante a gravidez atual e ocorrência de Morbidade materna grave (p>0,264), foram verificados fatores associados com condições sociodemográficas e reprodutivas desfavoráveis entre as mulheres expostas a IPV e entre aquelas que desenvolveram Morbidade materna grave. O monitoramento sistemático da Morbidade materna grave e o rastreamento rotineiro para IPV entre gestantes são importantes medidas para reduzir a morbimortalidade materna e para qualificar os serviços de atenção à saúde reprodutiva.

10.
Indian J Public Health ; 2016 Apr-jun; 60(2): 159-163
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179819

ABSTRACT

This descriptive observational study was carried out in Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital to identify predictors and outcome of obstetric admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Ninety consecutive pregnant patients or those up to 42 days of termination of pregnancy admitted to ICU from October 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled as study subjects with selection of a suitable comparison group. Qualitative statistics of both groups were compared using Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Odds ratio was calculated for significant factors. Low socioeconomic status, duration of complaints more than 12 h, delay at intermediary facility, and peripartum hysterectomy increased probability of admission to ICU. High incidence of obstetric admissions to ICU as compared to other countries stresses on need for separate obstetric ICU. Availability of high dependency unit can decrease preload to ICU by 5%. Patients with hemorrhagic disorders and those undergoing peripartum hysterectomy need more intensive care.

11.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-165884

ABSTRACT

Background: Objectives: To compare misoprostol 600 mcg, oral with carboprost 125 mcg, i.m., in the active management of third stage of labour. Methods: A total of 200 pregnant women of 38-42 weeks of gestation delivering vaginally in the Shivamogga institute of medical sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India were selected for study. 100 women received misoprostol 600 mcg, orally and 100 women received carboprost 125 mcg, i.m. immediately after delivery of baby and cord clamping by the method of randomisation. Results: In the misoprostol group, mean blood loss is 134.9 ml, mean duration of the third stage of labour is 4.07 min and mean fall in hemoglobin is 0.34 g/dl. In the carboprost group, mean blood loss is 123.7 ml, mean duration of the third stage of labour is 3.73 min and mean fall in hemoglobin is 0.28 g/dl. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the above mentioned factors. There were 5 cases of PPH in the misoprostol group and 3 cases in the carboprost group. 21 cases in the misoprostol group and 14 cases in the carboprost group required additional oxytocics. Unpleasant side effects like diarrhoea and vomiting were more in carboprost group. Conclusion: Oral misoprostol is as effective as carboprost in AMTSL and can be used safely in vaginal deliveries for prevention of PPH, especially in non-institutional deliveries and in places of low resource settings.

12.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-153333

ABSTRACT

Background: Maternal mortality has been the indicator of measurement of maternal health. Over the last decade, identification of severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) has emerged as a compliment or alternative to investigation of maternal deaths. A review of causes of SAMM will help to find out the potential problems which in turn will enable women to get the treatment on time. Recent researches have suggested that proper identification of SAMM cases can prove to be a better method to monitor the quality and effectiveness of obstetric care than mortality alone. Although there have been many criteria which have been introduced from time to time to identify these cases, because of vast variation of different level of facilities, these criteria cannot be applied across the regions. WHO has recently come up with certain set of criteria which could be more applicable to low resource settings. Aims & Objective: Present study tried to identify SAMM cases through various criteria and compared the applicability of them in our setup which is resource poor setting catering mainly to a huge rural population. Materials and Methods: It is a prospective study done over a period of one year, from September 2012 to August 2013. All severely morbid pregnant women or who had delivered or aborted within 42days were included. Initial identification of these cases was done on the basis of general criteria and later on other criteria were applied according to the primary obstetric event, clinical features, Lab findings or management provided. A comparison was done amongst all criteria and their individual applicability was checked as per the facility available in our set up. Results: During the study period total 7819 women delivered in the hospital out of which 6498 delivered vaginally and 1321 delivered through caesarian section. Total live births during this period were 5219. The present study found an incidence of severe maternal morbidity/near miss ranging from 5.56 to 40 per 1000 live births. Among 244 women suspected to be SAMM/MNM, 179(73%) met Waterstone’s criteria, 48(20%) met Mantel’s Criteria and 63(26%) met WHO criteria, 20% women met Mantel and Waterstone’s criteria both while 17% met all three criteria. Conclusion: The study of SAMM cases and their identification through suitable criteria can contribute to know its magnitude, as well as to identify most frequent characteristics and clinical conditions which will help to recognize the problems in antenatal services, peripheral health care facilities and referral system. The criteria which are available now cannot be applied uniformly, and need to be tailored to identify more specific criteria according to infrastructure of a particular setting in order to utilize resources effectively.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL